Search Our Site

Search form

social

Help Stop the Bush Administration's Latest Debacle: Aerial Gunning of Greater Yellowstone Wolves

July 25, 2007 | Wolves / Legislature / Environment

In 1995, Canada sent 35 gray wolves to the state of Idaho, to help reintroduce wolves to the Yellowstone region of the Norwest United States. Protected under the Endangered Species Act, free-living wolves flourished in the Yellowstone area of the Northern Rockies in Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana. Gray wolves play a beneficial role in the ecosystem, and they also help to maintain healthy populations of raptors, rodents, and coyotes and other animals.

Now the Bush administration's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has cleared the way for states to begin aerial gunning these reintroduced wolf families as early as this fall. This disgraceful scheme, supported by a coalition of hunters and ranchers, aims to kill up to 700 wolves, which will decimate the current population of approximately 1,200. Wolves would be removed from the list of federally protected, threatened and endangered species, but the aircraft-assisted killing would begin while they are still on the list. Wolves could be shot on sight in most parts of the states, if they travel outside the safety of Yellowstone or Grand Tetons National Park.

Hasn't Bush or the officials in these three states learned anything from shameful wolf control programs in Alaska? When the Alaska Board of Game and Department of Fish and Game moved to deploy, as The New York Times editorialized on March 14, 2004, "an air force to hunt animals" as a method of suppressing wolf populations to make moose hunting more convenient, there were audible protests around the world, and a successful travel boycott of Alaska, launched by Friends of Animals. Why do Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana officials want to step into the same firestorm of criticism by signifying their return to wrongheaded wolf persecution routines?

Following Alaska down the slippery slope of a primitive, violent, wolf slaughter scheme, federal and state officials also failed to justify their machinations with good science. The purported goal is to protect elk populations, yet there is no clear evidence of any decline in elk. Moreover, elk are coveted by hunters.

For example, in Idaho, elk populations are 20 percent above so-called management objectives, according to Idaho Fish and Game's 2006 progress report, which stated, "Overall elk populations statewide are near all time highs." Yet this same agency based the plan for the aerial gunning of wolves on a "trend count" in the Clearwater region, relying on astonishingly unscientific data in which eight cows were reportedly killed by wolves in the area.

This example of politics trumping science is also based on the faulty reasoning that wolves can be killed in large numbers with no biological problem, simply because their high reproductive rates and dispersal capabilities enable them to restore their populations quickly. These views are without sensitivity to shattering the lives of individual animals, or the damage it does to destroy members of a socially cohesive group.

Ranchers and hunters have spearheaded the campaign for this wolf-killing scheme, led by Idaho's Ron Gillett, of the Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition. Using a dead wolf as their mascot, Gillett's group distributes "Kill a Wolf" bumper stickers and describes the animals as "land piranhas." At one of their rallies earlier this year at the Idaho Capitol, Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter endorsed their efforts, promising that the state would kill more than 500 wolves after delisting. Added Otter, "I'm going to bid for the first ticket to shoot a wolf." The Idaho legislature then voted to allow permits to kill wolves for only $9.75.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is accepting public comments on their "wolf control" scheme plan until Monday, August 6, 2007. Priscilla Feral, president of Friends of Animals advises, "The Draconian wolf-control measures these states are proposing are best left for snow removal."

Please write to oppose the wolf control schemes. Ask the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to prevent states from initiating aerial shooting schemes -- out of respect for the inherent value of the wolves, and in the interest of a thriving biocommunity in which theenvironment is protected and wolves remain free.

Ed Bangs, Western Gray Wolf Recovery Coordinator

Email: Wolf RuleChange@fws.gov -- include "Wolf PDM Plan Comments" in the subject line.

Phone: 406-449-5225, ext. 204

Email: nrmgraywolf@fws.gov (additional email) -- include "Wolf PDM Plan Comments" in the subject line.

Comments

Yet another diabolical plan from this administration to do everything in its power to destroy our planet and everything in it. Thank you for writing this article to try to bring some awareness to save the wolf, a beautiful and sacred animal. Rax

GOD HELP US, MOSTLY THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE A HEART AND THOSE WHO LIVE ONLY BY THE ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR ONE DAY WE WILL BE ASKING WHERE DID ALL THE ANIMALS GO!! God, made it so each animal and person have a purpose in this World. We took over their land, their home not the other way around.

What has happened to this administration. This is maddness to kill and shoot these wonderful creatures. I am so distressed about the decisions being made.

God, made it so each animal and person have a purpose in this World. We took over their land, their home not the other way around. GOD HELP US, MOSTLY THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE A HEART AND THOSE WHO LIVE ONLY BY THE ALL MIGHTY DOLLAR ONE DAY WE WILL BE ASKING WHERE DID ALL THE ANIMALS GO! Shirley

It seems to me that these amazing animals where reintroduced to the Yellowstone region for a purpose. Like, they were endangered. So, why are you tring to take steps backwards in this process. When the original plan is to let these animals grow in numbers. NOT to knock them down when they got to a certain point! The Idaho ledislature then voted to allow permits to kill wolves for only $9.75. Bush Administration's U.S Fish and Wildlife Service has cleared the way for states to begin aerial gunning! Thats not all. A coalition of hunters and ranchers, aims to kill up to 700 wolves, which will decimate the current population of 1,200. On astonishingly unscientific data in which eight cows were reported killed by wolves. The aerial gunning is all because they want to protect elk populations, yet there is no clear evidence of any decline in elk! Hunters and ranchers just want the convenience of no competition. Which I thought was part of the point of hunting and ranching. Yellowstone covers about 2.2 million acres of land and has an average elevation 7,300 feet(2300m). I found only 9 pack of wolves found in Yellowstone and Im sure there are more, but doesn't that sound pretty fair so far? A typical wolk pack is highly structured, highly social group. The average pack in the wild consists of six-eight members. When a member of the pack or alpha member dies. Leads to a great deal of stress on the pack. The survivor's will general disperse. Some as loners, some travel together in sibling pairs. Which survival becomes that much harder. So, if this aerial gunning takes out one-two members a pack. There wont be many left at all in six months time. Please stop this barbarian aerial gun slaughter!

Once again, ignorance typical of this pitiful administration... what more can they do wrong? It's disgaceful.

here's a thought, turn bush loose alone in yellowstone and.........

here we go again, didn't anyone learn anything from alaska. kill all the wolf to save all the elk, then kill all the elk.and create an airforce to do it. doesnt anyone screen these people before giving them a job. if you have a brain dead idea, please keep it to yourself.these people are elected to improve things, unnecessay slaghter of a wolf was not part of it. to the fed. fish and wildlife, gov. butcher otter and the 2 other states that came up with stupid idea,THANK YOU FOR BLOWING MY HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS TO SATISFY A FEW ANIMAL ABUSERS THAT ARE NOT JUST SATISFIED KILLING ELK. pitty they cant just issue permits so they can shoot each other, then we wouldnt even have to deal with this issue.

Bush has shown no respect for his parents by letting others kill each other and killing animals, no clean air, killing the forest in Alaska...

Shooting wolves from planes or any other vantage point is cruel and unusual punishment for these magnificent creatures. I never thought there was much compassion in the Bush administration but this is just plain mean and vindictive. How would George W. like it if hunters in planes took shots at his dogs from over the White House lawn?

Pages

Add new comment