Search Our Site

Search form

social

UI's parakeet purge costs $698.32 for each dead bird

December 09, 2005 | Monk Parakeet
By Ken Dixon, published in The Connecticut Post on December 9, 2005

A total of 179 monk parakeets were killed during the United Illuminating Co.'s three-week campaign to destroy nests on more than 100 utility poles in southwestern Connecticut, the Connecticut Post has learned. Animal-rights activists said Thursday that many more apparently escaped capture by UI crews and death at the hands of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which asphyxiated the birds with carbon dioxide.

Monk Parakeet

Priscilla Feral, president of the Friends of Animals, which withdrew a lawsuit against UI this week after it agreed to stop capturing the birds, said the parrots died senselessly in the $125,000 eradication program.

"That's $698.32 per dead parrot in costs to taxpayers or rate-payers," Feral said Thursday after being informed of the death toll. "What a waste."

She estimated that as many as 400 birds escaped capture and will be homeless this winter as UI tears the nests down over the next three weeks in the second phase of the effort.

Albert Carbone, spokesman for UI, said the $125,000 included the cost of training crews as well as removing the thatched-stick nests, which the utility says have caused up to a dozen power outages annually, plus four transformer fires in recent years.

The cost also included a fee paid to the USDA for euthanizing the monk parakeets - actually green parrots the size of pigeons that have lived along the Connecticut shore for more than 30 years, nesting in fir trees and oaks as well as utility poles.

Dwight G. Smith, chairman of the biology department at Southern Connecticut State University who has studied the parrots for years, said Thursday he is convinced UI didn't fully consider nonlethal alternatives when it developed its eradication effort, which began with no public notice the week of Nov. 14.

"I and others would be very interested in searching for a solution that's positive for the birds and positive for UI that doesn't involves killing anything, especially an animal that's generally well-liked by the public and brightens an urban environment," he said.

Meanwhile, Speaker of the House James A. Amann, D-Milford, said he hopes the General Assembly, which removed protections from the birds in 2003, can work with the utility and the state Department of Environmental Protection to allow UI to clear nests from poles without killing the birds.

USDA spokeswoman Corey L. Slavitt said Thursday that the department's regional office in Amherst, Mass., which assisted UI, reported the total at 179 euthanized birds. She could not say whether the euthanasia program was permanently shut down after an agreement in a Superior Court judge's office this week.

"The USDA is seeking formal clarification of the project status, but we do not anticipate any involvement for the rest of the year," she said.

Feral has said that the lawsuit, removed without prejudice this week, will be pursued further in the new year in an attempt to stop future bird killings.

Feral said the 103 targeted nests along the coast between West Haven and Fairfield sheltered in some cases dozens of birds. If only 179 were captured and killed, more than twice that number may have escaped the nighttime raids, she said.

Up to 40 birds have been found in the larger nests, some of which dramatically drape UI poles and transformers.

Some West Haven neighbors have said in recent days that UI has let the nests grow for eight years or more. Feral believes the eradication campaign, first reported in the Connecticut Post on Nov. 17, has become a public relations nightmare for UI.

"I'm not even sure that UI will go ahead now with the tear-down because of the public pressure, but then again why should they worry about that now?" Feral said.

"We are done capturing birds and moving into the nest-removal part of the program," Carbone said.

He said UI is waiting for a project manager's decision before tearing down the nests. He said the company would consider developing ways to remove the nests without harming the birds.

Amann said Thursday that he also hopes a long-term answer can be found.

Rep. Richard Roy, D-Milford, co-chairman of the Environment Committee, said he has seen parrots that escaped UI crews on West Haven's Ocean Avenue, near their raided nests.

"I hope that as UI does continue its program to relieve the pressure on their lines, that they'll take the utmost care for the safety of the birds," Roy said.

Comments

"He said UI is waiting for a project manager?s decision before tearing down the nests. He said the company would consider developing ways to remove the nests without harming the birds." Hey Carbone, Read my lips "REMOVING THE NESTS NOW HARMS THE BIRDS, AS IN KILL, THE HUMANE ACTION IS TAKING THE NESTS DOWN IN SPRINGTIME. To that I would applaud you. How 'bout smelling the coffee, pal. Sincerely, Ken Bernacky

I was so thrilled to see this article on the front page! Stick it to UI! Embarass the hell out of them! Keep it coming! Keep the letters going to UI and legislators, everyone!

Any new bird in the area Native or Non-Native should be protected. Why that was reversed in 2003, needs to be looked into and reversed. Is killing sparrows,bluebirds etc next. The only reason (never should have happened at all) these birds were killed was because they were on poles ( for MANY, MANY years) and NO EFFORT WAS EVEN DONE to remove them HUMANELY PRIOR . UI, USDA, CT AUDUBON,DEP, NEVER made an effort to work with the public and did this behind everyones back! THEY ARE LIABLE and its their fault .Other cities, towns, states have done so humanely. What happened here?? Why no public notification?? Who allowed this cruelty? There needs to be an investigation, so this kind of animal cruelty is not performed anywhere again. Leave the nests there, let the birds remain through the winter.What is the SUDDEN urgency after all of these years!! Haven't you performed enough death. Why do more by removing their nests in WINTER and have these birds freeze to death with no homes to go to. This is an outrage!

Just curious, how come UI got off in court with not being told to stop everything till spring when more humane ways are at hand? Why were they not ordered to stop taking down nests as well?? I know we should be thankful for what is. But taking nests down now in the cold so these birds have no where to go is still a death sentence. They will freeze. Is this what UI and the others want??? Guess so!! Their motto is: we will stop gassing the birds to death but we will take their homes away so they die anyway from the cold. SHAME ON YOU!!!! These birds are not bothering anybody, all they want to do is live with their families. Why take that a way from them?? Blog editors' note: The company stopped taking nests down except for in its current phase of the eradications, where it plans to remove only the nests that have already been emptied. As you mention, if birds have repopulated there, such removal would likely be fatal to the birds and would thus defeat the spirit of the agreement to hold off on the killings. Therefore the community must be vigilant. Keep up these communications so that the advocates and the media are informed. The agreement so far is far from perfect; but it's drawing statements from lawmakers that it's clear the community finds maltreatment of these birds unacceptable, and that the company must develop a policy that ensures respectful conduct.

Ack!!! It's just all about money these days!!! :( I actually work with United Illuminating as well as Connecticut Light & Power and many other New England utility companies. I am extremely distressed they would do this!!!

How can I get involved in protesting the killing of the parakeets in Bridgeport/stratford. To whom can I talk to, e-mail, or send letters to. This really sends a great message to our kids. "Kill the birds because they are not native to New England." cheryl mitchell Blog editors' note: Thanks, Cheryl; check back frequently for activist updates; and see below for the parties involved in the decision to evict and kill the birds.

Contact:

The United Illuminating Company
UIL Holdings Corporation
157 Church Street
P.O. Box 1564
New Haven, CT 06506 Nathaniel Woodson, Chairman of the Board and CEO
nathaniel.woodson@uinet.com
Phone: 203 926-4637
Fax: 203-499-3286 USDA, Massachusetts/Rhode Island/Connecticut
Monte Chandler
monte.d.chandler@aphis.usda.gov 463 West Street
Amherst, MA 01002
413-253-2403 The Connecticut Audubon Society
Milan Bull
2325 Burr Street
Fairfield, CT 06824
203-259-6305, ext 113
mbull@ctaudubon.org Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
Wildlife Division
Dale May
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
860-424-3011
dale.may@po.state.ct.us

Add new comment