Search Our Site

Search form

social

Vicious: Sarah Palin's War on Wolves

September 11, 2008 | Wolves / Alaska Boycott

by Marybeth Holleman
Anchorage, Alaska

This past June, on a cool morning in southwest Alaska, fourteen wolf pups were pulled from their dens and shot in the head, one by one, by state biologists sanctioned by Governor Sarah Palin. At a month old, these pups had opened their eyes and ears less than two weeks earlier. They had ventured from the dark safety of the den once or twice. They had grown into rolling, tumbling, play-fighting puppies for whom their only care was, when would they next get to nurse?

They still depended entirely on their parents and their packs for food, shelter, protection. But every single adult member of their packs had already been gunned down from above by the Alaska state workers who shot them. These pups did nothing to deserve such a malicious early end to life other than to be born a wolf in Alaska in the era of Sarah Palin.

To most Americans in this day and age, this is atrocious. But to those of us who have watched Sarah Palin at work for the past two years, it's not at all surprising. As Governor, Palin has expanded Alaska's aerial hunting further and faster than any predecessor, since anything seen since territorial days, when all predators were targeted for extermination as worthless vermin.

I've lived in Alaska for nearly 25 years, long enough to see the on-again off-again cycles of predator control. But never has the killing of wolves and bears in order to inflate the numbers of moose and caribou been so widespread and mean-spirited as under Palin's reign.

Under Palin, private citizens kill wolves from planes under the guise of predator control. They run the wolves to exhaustion, and then shoot them. Under Palin, for the first time in 20 years, wolves are also gunned down from state-chartered helicopters. Palin authorized $400,000 in state funds for advertising to persuade Alaskans to vote against a ballot initiative that would have curtailed aerial hunting. Her propaganda was successful; the ballot measure failed.

Under Palin, for the first time since Alaska's statehood in 1958, it's legal to do land-and-shoot killing of bears and their cubs. Under Palin, predator control has spread from one to five regions of Alaska, to over 60,000 square miles, more than at any time since statehood. Nearly 800 wolves have been shot from planes, and some 2,000 are killed every year by other methods. And that's just the reported deaths. Palin even went so far last year as to put a bounty on wolves-she wanted to pay $150 for a foreleg of each dead wolf. Thanks to Friends of Animals, Alaska Wildlife Alliance, and Defenders of Wildlife, her wolf bounty was ruled illegal by the courts.

Wildlife scientists from around the country are dismayed at Palin's predator program, noting it doesn't meet the standards recommended by the U.S. National Research Council to justify, implement, monitor, and evaluate. Last year, 172 scientists wrote to Palin, warning her that if she did reach the "unsustainable historically high" moose and caribou numbers she sought, it would ecologically backfire in a huge way: not only would she put at risk the long-term health of Alaska's wolves, but of the very moose and caribou she sought to increase.

Palin would have the rest of Americans believe that this massive slaughter is acceptable, indeed necessary. She points to fifty years of statehood in which wolves have not become extinct. But the extent of the kill now far surpasses anything we've ever seen.

Even many Alaska hunters have grown outraged over Palin's out-of-control wolf control. Most recently, she's tried to give even more power to the Board of Game-the one that she appoints. This, wrote Alaska Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, would give her Board "more leeway without any scientific input to do whatever the hell they basically wanted." This program has been a true black eye for all hunters in Alaska, and for our state.
Contrary to what Palin would have Americans believe, only 14 percent of Alaskans hunt. Of those, a small percentage are true subsistence hunters. Palin wants wolves and bears scraped from the landscape so it's easier for urban hunters to get their kill in a weekend.

Don't let her fool you: Wasilla has just as many big-box and fast-food stores as any place in America, and just as many opportunities to make money to buy food. Alaskans haven't paid income tax for decades, and instead get over $1000 a year-for every man, woman, and child-in oil dividends. It's not economic necessity that drives the killing of wolves.

During Alaska's gubernatorial debates, Palin spoke with such passionate hatred about the need to kill wolves and bears that it sounded like we were thrown back into the dark ages of wildlife management, when bounties were paid for the feet of bald eagles, the fins of seals and sea lions, the skins of fox, coyote, wolf, and bear. Yes: bald eagles. They were blamed for eating too many salmon.

I was raised Catholic. I learned early on that if someone persecutes one group that's different from them, they also persecute others who are "different." It has taken the national media spotlight and her vicious statements on national stage to show Alaskans what we didn't know when Palin ran for Governor-to expose her disdain not only for non-human life, but also for those of different races, nationalities, and religions.

As a Catholic, I also learned that we have a responsibility to all living things. Not just human life, but all life. Which is, as we all now know, inextricably linked to all that we need in order to survive. Food, air, water, shelter. Safety. All that those wolf pups wanted from life. And all that was taken from them.

Comments

I would not have voted for Mc Cain to begin with, he's goerge's twin brother. After reading this there is no doubt. (Would they) should shoot down babies in the head!!!!

...and all this murder coming from a woman that says she believes so strongly in the preservation life. I am not trying to say that an animals' life is equivalent to a humans...but to blatantly kill an already accomplished, adjusted life without warrant is murder no matter what species we are talking about...and sarah?....hold the lipstick...it isn't working on me.

As usual, the "News Media" ignores the truth. This "person" is a murderer. Her kid doesn't have (any) sense... McCain is so far out of touch with the electorate that it's inconceviable Want to see the United States go down the tubes? Elect either of the "choices!"

This is blatant cruelty by anyone, but not surpising...The first time I saw her posing triumptly over the dead body of a beautiful Elk (that she had shot and killed) and the picture of her with a shotgun draped over her shoulder like a badge of authority...I knew then there was something running deep within her that I would not want to place in authority over Nature...much less an office of authority over my Country.

This is blatant cruelty by anyone, but not surpising...The first time I saw her posing triumptly over the dead body of a beautiful Elk (that she had shot and killed) and the picture of her with a shotgun draped over her shoulder like a badge of authority...I knew then there was something running deep within her that I would not want to place in authority over Nature...much less an office of authority over my Country. Cathedral City, CA

Anyone that can do this will not get a vote from me. This is appalling.

Cruel. Selfish. That's all that can be said about a woman like her. I would never,ever vote for someone who can have such disregard for an animals life. I too saw the photo of her standing with her daughter over an elk she had just killed. There is something wrong with a person who gets joy out of a horrible act like that. It will be a very sad day if she and McCain are voted into office.

As a strong supporter of environmental and wildlife issues, this attrocious incident first came to my attention through Defenders of Wildlife. I am more concerned than ever that the public needs to be informed of how vicious this woman can be. I certainly would not vote for someone with such a cruel nature and I don't see anything Christian about her ethics! Evidently earmarks, oil money and undoubtedly - POWER - are paramount on her agenda. WHAT CAN WE DO? We can tell everyone we know about this. Write Letters to the Editor of all area newspapers, post on MySpace or other commonly visited websites, send a letter to TV and radio stations (both local and national) demanding that this information be released (CNN has already done a story but they soft-peddled it. Try MSNBC, instead). I came across this article due to my concern for what was happening to Alaskan wolves. That prompted me to check out various websites. I'm glad to see I wasn't alone.

This woman is a disgrace to humankind. She brags about being a pit bull? .........

She is a disgrace,where is her kindness for all living creatures? She should look at herself in the mirror and see if she likes what she is and is becoming.. Who died and left her boss and to take it upon herself to decide WHAT ANIMAL WILL LIVE TODAY OR WHO WILL DIE?

Pages

Add new comment