Search Our Site

Search form

social

CALL to Action: Reject U.S. Government Proposal to Shoot Horses

July 23, 2008 | Horses / Hunting & Wildlife Management

JULY 2008, DARIEN, CONN. -- Following the latest obnoxious proposal this month from the U.S. government to kill thousands of horses, the international animal advocacy organization Friends of Animals again calls for a full moratorium on the government-sanctioned round-ups, sales and slaughter of free-living horses.[1]

The federal Bureau of Land Management set out in helicopters and harassed and chased roughly half the western herd of mustangs -- a group numbering 30,000 -- into a corral. And now, the officials are proposing to start killing them.

Environmentalists, The New York Times tells us, will go along with this violence because they see the mustangs as "top-of-the-food-chain bullies whose hooves and teeth disturb the habitats of endangered tortoises and desert birds."[2]

We at Friends of Animals are also environmentalists. We aren't calling these horses "icons" or "part of the imagery" of the west. We are calling for respect, and our government should deliver.

If horses are at the top of the so-called food chain, it's our government's fault. Where are the carnivore animals? We could put the blame for their absence squarely at the feet of the U.S. government and its predator-control schemes.

Conflict of Interest?

The Bureau of Land Management is charged with protecting wild horses and burros on the western rangelands. Yet it routinely rounds them up and passes them to private ownership. The bureau is poised to shoot several thousand of them (it plans to decide on the matter after a Congressional audit that's due to be completed in September). To justify this proposal, officials are complaining about expenses. Yet the bureau allows ranchers to enjoy leases to the rangelands for a pittance. Ranchers who claim mustang "overpopulation" degrades the environment. Balderdash.

At the beginning of the 20th century, there were about 2 million mustangs in the wilderness.[3] Today, there's a total of 60,000 (if that many). This community of horses is degrading the environment, but the owners of 3 million cattle are not?

"We must stop supporting the profits of ranches," said Friends of Animals president Priscilla Feral. "For those who respect free-living animals, it's simply not enough to express outrage at the proposed shooting of horses. We need to end the cycle of violence. It's high time we acknowledge the connection between horsemeat and hamburgers."

 addiction to animal products.
Priscilla Feral points out the unavoidable root of the problem: addiction to animal products.

Just two years ago, the Bureau of Land Management relaxed the rules and regulations governing ranchers on public land, cutting back on conservation provisions, and allowing ranchers significantly more control. The opposite pressure should be occurring. Ranchers do not merit the support of the government while they siphon land and resources and push free animals to the brink of extinction -- and then blame horses for the mess.

Then we have Jay Kirkpatrick, an experimenter who directs the Science and Conservation Center in Billings, Montana, quoted in The New York Times as saying insufficient weight is being given to birth control for horses. But animals in nature don't need to be controlled by a species that has such difficulty in controlling itself.

For three decades, the Bureau of Land Management has backed costly experiments with contraception as a way to continue aggressive management practices. Jay Kirkpatrick, together with the Humane Society of the United States, have promoted the invasive and disturbing tests of hormones and the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida, or PZP, in free-roaming horses.

Terms like "overabundant" and "overpopulation" are liberally applied wherever free-living animals are deemed inconvenient. The underlying message is that, if not controlled, free-living animals will take over. This both reflects and supports the systematic acceptance of control, and treats all of nature as a zoo.

Recommendations for Action from Friends of Animals:

Go to the root. This is a question of who gets the land: free-living animals, or cattle ranchers. The key step each of us can take in support of horses is to adopt a plant-based diet.

Oppose the BLM's proposal. If you've seen more than enough debates about whether the land can support horses and burros while all along the government supports the real environmental threat -- animal agribusiness -- tell the BLM now, using the link you see here. Or call the BLM toll-free: 1-800-710-7597. Let them know these mustangs should never have been corralled in the first place. Let the horses go, and let them be. Allow them the dignity of freedom.

Then find your representative in Congress, ring them up at 202.224.3121, and explain that real environmental awareness means questioning the influence of corporate profit-seekers over laws and agencies. Say "no" to horse-killing. And tell them you oppose roundups too.

Support Friends of Animals' new radio and television announcements. We're buying 30-second and one-minute announcement spots, asking the public to call the BLM and oppose the horse-killing proposal. You can sustain our public announcement throughout the audit period leading up to the BLM's decision. Let's make the most of the window of time these horses have. Invest in our public education effort; donate here.

Thank you for teaching respect for the autonomous animals of our Earth. Thank you for telling our government no to killing horses.

NOTES

[1] We have previously called for a repeal of the (2005) Burns Amendment, which reversed a 34-year prohibition on the slaughter of wild horses by enabling the BLM to sell off horses over 10 years of age.

[2] Felicity Barringer, "On Mustang Range, a Battle on Thinning the Herd" - New York Times (20 Jul. 2008).

[3] Deanne Stillman, "Wild Horses Aren't Free" - Los Angeles Times (2 Jun. 2008).

Friends of Animals, founded in 1957, advocates for the right of animals to live free according to their own terms.

Comments

What gives the government the right to destroy such beautiful animals? It's not like we have run out of land in America to place them somewhere else. Have they been offered to anyone who might want to take them in and care for them? I think the government should be more concerned with protecting such beautiful animals instead of killing them! Take some money from the crooked politicians pockets,feed and care for them, they are God's creatures, and a symbol of freedom and American beauty.

These are such beautiful animals! how dare they? they are treating them the same way as the american indians were killed for there land makes me so mad!! this must be stopped i signed every petition against this!

Thank you for sending this out. I have written my state rep and the BLM and sent your email to many others asking them to do the same. Without organizations such as yours, I doubt many of us would be aware of such atrocities. Thanks again.

Why not have some kind of sterilization policy, gelding the males, instead of killing them when there are too many? Would something like that be possible? I grew up around horses and know them to be intelligent and very sensitive creatures. This round up and slaughter must be terrifying for them. It makes me feel sick. FoA comments: The issue here is not too many horses, but the raising of cattle for human consumption. The immediate solution is to stop the grazing of cattle on government land.

HOW DIGUSTING!!! I CAN'T EVEN PHATHOM THE REASONS BESIDES MAKING ROOM FOR MORE ROADS OR GIANT HOMES THAT FALL TO FORECLOSER!!!

Why can't human beings just leave things alone?!?! We need to respect all walks of life not ruin it. Karma will come back to haunt these people eventually!!!!!!!!! I don't understand why humans always have to act like they are so superior.

North America has a wonderful heritage of wildness. If we don't start thinking creatively about saving this beauty, it will be gone forever. How about setting aside separate lands for wild horses where they will not be harrassed and slaughtered by ranchers, government agents and horse meat brokers? How about seeking the support, advice and active involvement of our native peoples? They have volunteered to adopt endangered Yellowstone bison, and perhaps they will adopt endangered wild horses as well, either on their own lands or on separate lands dedicated to the survival of wild horses.

I think that the slaughter of wild horses is absolutely horrible. I hope that our legislators will stand up for the horses and do something to prevent their slaughter.

The BLM needs to just be banished, KILLED OFF, SHOT DEAD - right along with the cattle and the ranchers who exploit our "PUBLIC" lands. The BLM wants donations? Why should any of the good citizens (most of us getting poorer by the minute) of this anymore "sick country" called the USA, send the BLM donations to try to help the horses and burros that the BLM is supposed to be protecting in the first place and now needs to KILL them? If the BLM gets more funding they will just buy more fuel (at an outrageous price) for helicopter roundups, and then they'll spend more of our donations on bullets! The BLM, Congress, and the Ranchers need to GO AWAY, not the wild horses and burros.

Horses helped build our country. Please show them the respect they deserve. It would be a travesty to kill them. Please consider sending them to Horse Sanctuaries

Pages